Rij toevoegen
Element toevoegen
kropper
update
Noorder Kempen Zakelijk
update
Element toevoegen
  • Thuis
  • ...
    • Medisch & Zorg
    • Agrarisch & Landbouw
    • Bouw & Renovatie
    • Detailhandel & Retail
    • Horeca & Toerisme
    • Industrie & Techniek
    • Logistiek & Transport
    • Zakelijke dienstverlening
    • Onderwijs & Vorming
    • ICT & Innovatie
    • Vastgoed
    • Vrije beroepen & Creatieve sector
    • bevolkingsgegevens
September 26.2025
2 Minutes Read

Aardappeloogst: Verstandig Oogsten Ondanks Lage Prijzen voor Telers

Potato harvest with modern machinery and green trailer, aardappeloogst lage prijzen.

Aardappeloogst: Een Noodzakelijke Keuze Ondanks Lage Prijzen

De huidige situatie van de aardappelprijzen heeft boeren in spanning gebracht. Terwijl de noteringen voor consumptieaardappelen opmerkelijk laag zijn, benadrukt de Taskforce Phytophthora dat akkerbouwers niet moeten aarzelen om hun gewas te oogsten. 'Niet-geoogste percelen zijn een potentieel probleem, vooral als het gaat om het verspreiden van ziekten,' zeggen experts. Illegale situaties, zoals die in het voorgaande jaar, waar niet geoogste percelen als nieuwe infectiebronnen fungeerden, moeten opnieuw worden voorkomen.

De Gevaren van Niet-Oogsten in de Aardappelteelt

Het niet oogsten van aardappelen betekent veel meer dan alleen verliezen in termen van opbrengst. Het creëert een voedingsbodem voor een tal van plagen en ziekten. Phytophthora, ook wel bekend als aardappelziekte, profiteert van niet-geoogste gewassen. Bovendien kan het gebrek aan actie leiden tot een hogere belasting van nitraat in het grondwater door uitspoeling. Dit is een groeiende zorg onder agrariërs, die zich moeten voorbereiden op een toekomst waarin de verborgen kosten van ziektebestrijding exponentieel kunnen stijgen.

Economische Overwegingen voor Akkerbouwers

Hoewel telers de druk voelen door de lage prijzen, is de beslissing om aardappelen niet te oogsten riskant. De Taskforce Phytophthora bevestigt dat een zorgvuldige afweging nodig is. Dit is niet alleen om kosten te drukken, maar ook om hogere plagen en ziekte in de toekomst te voorkomen. Telers kunnen kijken naar alternatieve methoden om hun kosten te beheren, zoals het implementeren van geïntegreerde plaagbestrijdingsstrategieën of door gebruik te maken van technologieën die de efficiëntie kunnen verhogen.

Lessons from the Past: Wat Kan de Toekomst Brengen?

De ervaring van het moeilijke najaar in 2023 zal zeker een les zijn voor de boeren in 2024. Veranderende weersomstandigheden, zoals steeds mildere winters, zorgen ervoor dat schade aan knollen door vervroegd invriezen afneemt. Dit kan echter ook leiden tot een toename van opslagplanten, wat weer leidt tot ongewenst hoge ziektekosten en plagen de volgende groeiperiode. Het belang van het maken van strategische beslissingen wordt steeds duidelijker voor de toekomst van de aardappeltele.

Actieve Preventie is de Sleutel

Telers worden aangemoedigd om actief te zijn in hun oogstroutines. De negatieve gevolgen van een niet-geoogste oogst zijn niet alleen economisch, maar ook ecologisch. Boeren moeten zich realiseren dat, hoewel de onmiddellijke verleiding van een hoge prijs om te oogsten misschien niet bestaat, de gezondheid van hun toekomstige gewassen op het spel staat.

Conclusie: Een Verstandige benadering van Oogsten

De boodschap van de Taskforce Phytophthora is duidelijk: het negeren van de huidige lage prijzen kan de toekomst van de akkerbouwers aanzienlijk beïnvloeden. Wetenschappers en landbouwdeskundigen beveiligen de toekomst van de industrie door telers aan te moedigen om te oogsten, ongeacht de marktmondingen. Het is van cruciaal belang om proactief te zijn en de integriteit van de toekomstige gewassen te waarborgen. Teleurstellingen kunnen de eeuwige cirkel van mislukte seizoenen en ongecontroleerde plagen dienen verergeren.

Agrarisch & Landbouw

2 Views

0 Comments

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts
11.11.2025

Overijssel's Bold Steps to Enhance Water Quality for Farmers

Update Overijssel's New Water Quality Measures: A Necessity for the FutureIn a proactive initiative to safeguard its water resources, Overijssel has announced additional measures focused on meeting the goals of the European Water Framework Directive (Kaderrichtlijn Water, KRW). The measures are designed not only to combat pollution but also to prevent drought—a pressing issue for the region as climate change intensifies.Understanding the KRW ImpulsThe KRW-impuls, coupled with the 'Implementation Agenda for Drinking Water Source Protection,' outlines essential actions aimed at improving groundwater quality, particularly in areas critical for drinking water supplies. Gedeputeerde Martijn Dadema from GroenLinks emphasizes the urgency and ambition behind these initiatives, stating, "Together, we must ensure that sufficient clean water is available and remains accessible." This requires not just conscious water use but also a landscape management approach that allows for prolonged water retention especially in dry spells.The Role of Monitoring: Early Warning Systems ExplainedA significant component of Overijssel's strategy includes comprehensive monitoring efforts. The province has established an Early Warning Monitoring Network (EWM), which tracks the condition of the upper groundwater layer across 64 designated sites. This network is an upgrade from previous monitoring systems and aims to provide timely data on groundwater quality. The first reports on this monitoring are expected by early 2026, providing crucial insights into trends and necessary interventions.Importance of Water Quality for Agricultural SustainabilityFor agrarians, the implications of these measures are profound. Quality water is vital for farming and livestock. Farmers are encouraged to engage in sustainable water practices, which include minimizing harmful discharges and optimizing land use to enhance water retention. Implementing these practices is not just about compliance; it's about ensuring the longevity and productivity of the land.Facing Drought: A Local and Global ChallengeWith drought becoming a recurring theme across many regions globally, Overijssel’s approach stands as a model of proactive water management. The strategies outlined not only serve local farmers but also contribute to broader environmental health. Effective water management in Overijssel can set a precedent for other areas grappling with similar issues, encouraging collaborative efforts for sustainable resource management.The Community's Role in Water ConservationThe involvement of local communities is crucial in achieving these water quality goals. Public awareness campaigns and educational programs can help inform residents about the importance of conserving water and minimizing pollution. Communities that understand the value of sustainable practices will play a key role in supporting the province's initiatives.Conclusion: The Path ForwardAs the challenges posed by climate change continue to escalate, the province of Overijssel is taking significant steps to ensure the sustainability of its water resources. The new measures are not only about regulatory compliance but also about fostering a culture of responsibility among residents and farmers alike. It's a chance for everyone to engage actively in the preservation of their environment. By embracing innovative practices and supporting the province's initiatives, local agrarians can ensure that they are contributing to a resilient future. Governments and communities must act together to navigate the complexities of water management in our changing climate. Join the dialogue on water conservation and sustainable practices today!

11.09.2025

Celebrating the Recognition of Dutch Greenhouse Clusters: Impact on Farmers

Update Strengthening the Future of Dutch Greenhouse Horticulture The recent recognition of greenhouse clusters as integral to the national spatial policy is a triumph for the horticultural community in the Netherlands. In the recently released Design Note Space 2025, the government sets a clear vision for the spatial development of urban and rural areas through 2050. The new policy emphasizes building-bound agriculture, particularly focusing on greenhouse horticulture as a vital component capable of adapting to climate change. Understanding the Importance of Greenport Recognition The inclusion of greenhouse clusters, or greenports, showcases the Dutch government's commitment to supporting not just agriculture, but specifically the horticultural sector. Initially recognized in 2004 with only five greenports, this initiative has expanded to eight regional horticultural clusters across the country. These areas highlight the economic significance of the horticulture sector while ensuring minimal environmental impact and resource usage. This recognition is crucial as it places responsibility on municipalities to maintain conversations with the horticultural sector rather than unilaterally altering zoning plans. The government's endorsement is intended to protect these areas from encroaching developments that could jeopardize agricultural sustainability. Framing Future Agricultural Policy and Community Engagement A notable challenge highlighted in the policy is the rigidity within the current zoning structures which sometimes hampers flexibility in land use. As agricultural needs evolve due to climate pressures and urban development, the dialogue with local governments must remain open and responsive. Farmers must have assurance that their operational space will not be arbitrarily reduced, especially when competing interests, like residential development, arise. With this in mind, the government is tasked with developing alternative zones for agriculture in the event of zoning policy changes that directly affect farming operations. Ensuring sustainable land for agricultural use must form part of a cohesive strategy toward food security in the Netherlands. Linking Horticulture to Broader National Goals The Design Note Space articulates that greenhouse horticulture is more than just an industry; it intersects with national challenges including energy, water resources, and climate action. The government highlights the potential of harnessing solutions such as geothermal energy, waste heat, and CO₂ recycling, positioning greenhouse horticulture as a pivotal player in achieving goals for sustainability. In parallel, the societal push for and resilience against climate change dictates that meticulous planning is essential. Protecting the greenhouse clusters is recognized not only for their economic productivity but also as essential contributors to a broader environmental strategy that aims to enhance eco-effectiveness across the agricultural landscape. Community Response and Future Engagements Looking ahead, it is essential that community members, including farmers and industry leaders, actively engage with the policies being drafted. Creating robust back-and-forth communication channels with policymakers ensures that the realities and needs of those on the ground are heard and incorporated into future planning. As our nation grapples with urgent issues relating to food production and environmental stability, transparency and dialogue will be key in aligning national ambitions with local realities. Ultimately, as stewards of the land, the collective of farmers, local governments, and industry representatives must work together to champion not just the economic viability of horticulture, but its role as a cornerstone in sustainable living and resiliency in our interconnected world. Call to Action: A Unified Voice for Horticulture The agricultural sector must rise to the occasion and advocate for policies that ensure its long-term viability. Farmers are encouraged to participate in public consultations regarding the Design Note Space to voice their needs and secure their future. Collaborate, innovate, and strengthen ties with local officials—not just to protect your rights but to foster a resilient agricultural community that thrives amid challenges.

11.08.2025

Political Turmoil: Why Senator Departures at Party for the Animals Matter

Update Political Turmoil within the Party for the Animals The recent resignation of Senator Peter Nicolaï from the Party for the Animals (Partij voor de Dieren, PvdD) has triggered significant unrest within the organization. Nicolaï, who joins his colleague Niko Kofferman in a wave of departures, has taken his seat in the Eerste Kamer with him, reducing the party's representation to a mere one out of three seats left. This exodus raises questions about the internal dynamics and future direction of the PvdD, which has historically positioned itself as a champion for animal rights. Reasons Behind the Departures Central to this political upheaval appears to be a deepening rift within the party following controversial leadership choices by Esther Ouwehand. Critics of her management cite a significant deviation from the party’s foundational goals, highlighting a focus on military spending and international conflicts—issues that many feel detract from animal welfare. Ouwehand’s stance during debates surrounding the Gaza conflict, in particular, has left factions within the party voicing their discontent. As former PvdD members express their dissatisfaction, they have formed a new party called Vrede voor Dieren, indicating a shift in priorities that puts animal rights at the forefront, away from broader political engagements. Historical Context of the PvdD The Party for the Animals, founded in 2002, has evolved into an influential political force advocating for animal rights in the Netherlands. The founders intended to create a unique political space dedicated exclusively to the welfare of animals, contrasting with the traditional political landscape dominated by broader national issues. This recent turn of events suggests that the party may be straying from its central mission—a concern that resonates deeply within its core base of supporters. Emotional Reactions Among Supporters The resignations are more than just a political shift; they resonate on an emotional level with committed supporters of the PvdD. Many agrarians and animal welfare activists who have aligned themselves with the party are watching these changes unfold with disappointment, feeling that the leadership is not adequately reflecting their values. The party’s legacy as a pioneer in animal rights advocacy faces scrutiny as members express fears that its evolution might lead to a dilution of its core mission. Looking Ahead: Predictions for the PvdD As the PvdD struggles to define its identity under the current leadership, the future remains uncertain. The potential for further internal conflict looms, as more members could question their allegiance amidst dissatisfaction with policy directions. To regain their footing, the PvdD may need to reaffirm its commitments to its original mission. Whether the leadership addresses these fractures effectively will determine its long-term viability in the political landscape. The Relevance to Agrarians For the agrarian community, these developments are particularly pertinent. The PvdD has historically advocated for policies that affect animal husbandry practices, environmental regulations, and agricultural sustainability. With such leadership changes, agrarians must remain vigilant as policies are likely to shift. Understanding the dynamics within the PvdD could help farmers anticipate changes that could affect their operations. In conclusion, the recent departures from the PvdD underscore a critical moment for the party that may influence not only its trajectory but also the future of animal rights advocacy in Dutch politics. For supporters and agrarians alike, engaging with these changes is vital, as they will likely impact the landscape of agricultural policy and animal welfare initiatives in the Netherlands. Stay informed about these developments to better understand their implications for your practices and policies. The discussion surrounding these changes is ongoing—engagement is key.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*